2025's Top 5 Oxylabs Alternatives for Proxies and/or Web Scraping

Are Oxylabs’ prices outside your budget?

Or is their scraping tools falling short on performance?

No worries! Here are 5 alternatives split between proxy providers and scraping APIs that match or beat Oxylabs in at least one way.

What Oxylabs Does Well

Before we cover alternatives, here’s what makes Oxylabs a top proxy and web scraping solution:

Fastest Proxy Network with High Success Rates

Oxylabs achieved 99.82% success rates with 0.41-second average response times in testing, the fastest proxy response measured across all providers.

The platform operates 175M+ proxies across 195 countries, spanning residential, datacenter, ISP, and mobile networks. This gives you one of the largest pools in the industry with deep geographic targeting down to city and ASN levels.

AI Studio for Automated Data Extraction

Oxylabs’ AI Studio provides AI-powered tools to crawl and scrape websites automatically, accessing targets that other AI agents struggle with and building large datasets without manual selector maintenance.

Click to view full-size image

×

The system handles site structure changes and establishes scraping workflows that don’t break when target pages update their HTML. This reduces the ongoing maintenance burden for teams running continuous data collection operations.

Enterprise-Grade Reliability and Support

The proxy network uses ethically sourced proxies with transparent policies, meeting compliance requirements for enterprise customers operating in regulated industries.

Click to view full-size image

×

Support is consistently praised across review platforms, with dedicated account managers for larger plans and responsive technical assistance when issues arise. For teams where downtime costs real money, the support quality justifies premium pricing.

Downsides of Oxylabs

Despite the technical strengths, Oxylabs’ pricing model and API performance create friction for many users.

Pricing Targets Enterprise Customers Only

Oxylabs web scraper requires $75 upfront for 8GB to start testing, the highest entry point among major proxy providers. This creates a barrier before you know if the API works for your specific use case.

Residential proxies has no entry cost, $8 per GB with pay-per-GB billing that varies wildly based on page sizes, which is higher than most proxy providers out there.

Custom plans require contacting sales rather than simple pay-as-you-go options, adding friction before you can even start. For small to mid-sized projects needing a few hundred thousand requests monthly, the $75 minimum and enterprise-focused pricing structure feels overkill.

Web Scraping API Underperforms Dedicated Alternatives

If you’re evaluating Oxylabs for the Web Scraper API rather than raw proxies, the performance gap becomes obvious immediately.

The API delivered 92.52% success with 17.5-second average response times in testing. Compare that to Bright Data’s 98.44% success at 10.6 seconds or Scrape.do’s 98.19% at 4.7 seconds, and the reliability gap plus significantly slower speeds make Oxylabs uncompetitive for API use cases.

Pricing compounds the problem: $6.39 per 1,000 requests average compared to Scrape.do’s $0.80 means you’re paying dramatically more for objectively worse performance.

Oxylabs built its reputation on proxy infrastructure, and the API offering reflects that: proxies are the core strength, scraping APIs are an afterthought.

Datacenter and Residential Proxy Alternatives for Oxylabs

These proxy providers deliver comparable or better performance than Oxylabs’ proxy network, with more accessible pricing that removes the $75 barrier and offers transparent per-GB costs for budget planning.

Pricing data is based on the cheapest starting plans, bigger packages will have more affordable per IP/GB numbers. Success and speed rates provided by proxyway.com

1. SOAX

Click to view full-size image

×

SOAX operates 191M+ proxies across 195+ locations with unified pricing across both datacenter and residential proxy types.

The network achieved 99.73% success rates with 0.90-second average response times in testing, delivering the largest proxy pool among all alternatives tested, beating even Oxylabs’ 175M pool by 16 million IPs.

Pricing is $3.60 per GB for both datacenter and residential proxies, eliminating the complexity of separate pricing tiers.

Pros

• Largest proxy pool available: 191M+ IPs beats Oxylabs’ 175M, providing extreme geographic diversity and reducing duplicate IP risks even at massive scraping volumes.
• Unified pricing simplicity: Single $3.60/GB rate for both datacenter and residential proxies removes pricing complexity entirely. You don’t need to calculate different costs based on proxy type selection.
• Significantly cheaper than Oxylabs: $3.60 vs $8/GB residential makes it much more accessible while delivering nearly identical success rates (99.73% vs 99.82%).
• Precise geo-targeting down to city/ISP level: Target specific cities or ISPs for localized scraping, SEO monitoring, and region-specific data collection that requires granular location control.

Cons

• $99/month entry point: Higher than some alternatives, though still lower than Oxylabs’ $75 for 8GB. The 25GB plan ($99) provides more volume but requires monthly commitment.
• No pay-as-you-go option: Requires monthly plan commitment, reducing flexibility compared to Oxylabs’ pay-as-you-go model for testing different target domains.
• Mobile proxies drop occasionally: Users report intermittent disconnections during long sessions when using mobile proxies, though this affects a minority of use cases.

Oxylabs vs SOAX

SOAX’s 191M proxy pool beats Oxylabs’ 175M while costing significantly less ($3.60 vs $8/GB), but Oxylabs delivers faster response times (0.41s vs 0.90s) and slightly higher success rates (99.82% vs 99.73%).

Oxylabs wins on: Speed, success rates, and pay-as-you-go flexibility for testing.

SOAX wins on: Largest pool available, unified pricing simplicity, and much lower cost. For projects where scale matters more than absolute fastest response times, SOAX provides better value with the industry’s largest proxy network.

2. Decodo

Click to view full-size image

×

Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) provides 100K+ datacenter and 115M+ residential IPs across global locations with flexible rotation options.

The service achieved 99.86% success rates with 0.63-second response times in testing, delivering the highest success rate among all providers measured: including Oxylabs.

Pricing starts at $3 per GB for residential proxies, significantly cheaper than Oxylabs while outperforming on reliability.

Pros

• Highest success rate tested: 99.86% beats Oxylabs’ 99.82%, making it the most reliable proxy provider measured across all alternatives for consistent connection success.
• Significantly cheaper than Oxylabs: $3 vs $8/GB for residential proxies while delivering objectively higher success rates creates exceptional value for mid-sized operations.
• Extremely intuitive dashboard: Setup takes minutes with clear controls. Non-technical users can configure proxies without extensive documentation or support tickets.
• Large residential pool: 115M+ residential IPs provides strong geographic diversity, though smaller than SOAX’s 191M and Oxylabs’ 175M.

Cons

• Smaller pool than top-tier providers: 115M residential vs Oxylabs’ 175M and SOAX’s 191M. Geographic coverage is broad but IP density per region is lower.
• Slower than Oxylabs: 0.63s vs 0.41s response times. The 0.22-second difference compounds at scale but remains competitive compared to most alternatives.
• APIs not included by default: Scraping API features cost extra beyond base proxy plans, adding complexity if you need both proxy access and API functionality.

Oxylabs vs Decodo

Decodo delivers the highest success rate measured (99.86%), beating Oxylabs’ 99.82%, while costing significantly less ($3 vs $8/GB). Oxylabs counters with faster response times (0.41s vs 0.63s) and a larger proxy pool (175M vs 115M).

Decodo wins on: Success rates (best tested), cost savings, and ease of use for teams prioritizing reliability over absolute speed.

Oxylabs wins on: Speed, pool size, and enterprise features. For projects where every fraction of a second matters or you need extreme IP diversity, Oxylabs justifies the premium. For most use cases, Decodo’s higher success rate at much lower cost makes it the better choice.

3. IPRoyal

Click to view full-size image

×

IPRoyal offers 32M+ residential IPs with datacenter proxies sold per IP starting at $1.57/IP monthly and residential proxies from $7/GB.

The platform achieved 98.22% success rates with 1.36-second response times in testing. IPRoyal’s standout feature is unlimited bandwidth on datacenter proxies, eliminating per-GB fees that create unpredictability with Oxylabs and other providers.

Pros

• Slightly cheaper than Oxylabs: $7/GB residential vs Oxylabs’ $8/GB provides modest savings, but the unlimited datacenter bandwidth at $1.57/IP creates significant value for high-volume scraping.
• Unlimited bandwidth on datacenter proxies: Flat per-IP pricing with no bandwidth limits removes cost unpredictability entirely. Run high-volume operations without worrying about GB overages.
• Solid e-commerce performance: Consistent success on Shopify, Footsites, and moderate anti-bot protection. The proxies handle most commercial targets without constant failures.

Cons

• Smallest proxy pool: 32M residential IPs vs Oxylabs’ 175M and SOAX’s 191M. Geographic diversity is limited in less common regions, impacting projects requiring extreme location variety.
• Lower success rates: 98.22% vs Oxylabs’ 99.82%. The gap becomes noticeable on heavily protected sites where every failed request costs retry time and credits.
• Slower response times: 1.36s vs Oxylabs’ 0.41s. The speed difference significantly impacts throughput when scraping thousands of pages.

Oxylabs vs IPRoyal

Oxylabs dominates on infrastructure: 175M vs 32M IPs (much larger pool), 0.41s vs 1.36s response (significantly faster), and 99.82% vs 98.22% success (notably higher). IPRoyal counters with slightly cheaper residential pricing and unlimited datacenter bandwidth that eliminates overage concerns.

IPRoyal wins on: Budget-friendly pricing with unlimited datacenter bandwidth for high-volume scraping where response time isn’t critical.

Oxylabs wins decisively on: Pool size, speed, and success rates. For projects requiring reliability at scale, Oxylabs justifies the modest premium. IPRoyal works for cost-conscious operations where you can tolerate slower speeds and occasional failures.

Web Scraping API Alternatives for Oxylabs

Oxylabs’ Web Scraper API delivered 92.52% success with 17.5-second response times in testing, a performance that trails dedicated scraping APIs significantly. These alternatives provide faster speeds, higher success rates, and lower costs specifically designed for web scraping rather than raw proxy access.

The table above compares Oxylabs’ Web Scraper API with two tested alternatives based on independent benchmark data run across Amazon, Indeed, GitHub, Zillow, Capterra, Google, and X (Twitter). All APIs were tested under identical conditions with validation of actual page content, not just status codes.

4. Scrape.do

Click to view full-size image

×

Scrape.do delivered 98.19% success rates and 4.7-second average response times in testing, making it nearly 4x faster than Oxylabs’ API while maintaining near-perfect reliability.

The platform operates 110M+ IPs across datacenter, residential, and mobile networks with transparent credit multipliers (5x for rendering, 10x for premium proxies, 25x for both). The freemium plan includes 1,000 requests monthly with no phone verification required, and the $29 starter package provides 250K requests with clear, consistent pricing across all domains.

Pros

• Nearly 4x faster than Oxylabs API: 4.7s vs 17.5s average response times. When you’re scraping thousands of pages, that speed difference translates directly to higher throughput and faster data delivery.
• Notably higher success rate: 98.19% vs Oxylabs’ 92.52% means significantly more successful requests per 1,000 attempts, reducing retries and wasted credits.
• Dramatically cheaper per request: $0.80 vs $6.39 per 1K makes large-scale operations much more affordable. A 1M request project costs $800 vs Oxylabs’ $6,390.
• Transparent opt-in pricing: Parameters are disabled by default. You enable rendering or premium proxies explicitly, and credit multipliers apply consistently. No surprise charges on simple pages like Oxylabs’ flat API rates.
• No verification freemium access: Test with 1,000 free requests without phone verification, unlike many competitors requiring contact details before trial access.

Cons

• No official SDKs: Community SDKs exist for popular languages, but there are no officially maintained libraries. Teams requiring enterprise SDK support need custom wrappers.
• Limited ready-to-use scrapers: Provides domain-specific examples and working code for popular sites but not the breadth of pre-built no-code solutions that enterprise platforms like Bright Data offer.

Oxylabs vs Scrape.do

Scrape.do dominates on API performance across every metric: nearly 4x faster (4.7s vs 17.5s), notably higher success (98.19% vs 92.52%), and dramatically cheaper ($0.80 vs $6.39 per 1K). The performance gap makes this comparison straightforward.

Oxylabs’ strength is proxy infrastructure—175M IPs with 0.41s response and 99.82% success on raw proxy access. If you need proxies, Oxylabs excels.

For web scraping API use cases, Scrape.do is the clear winner. The speed, reliability, and cost advantages are substantial enough that there’s no scenario where Oxylabs’ API makes sense over Scrape.do unless you’re already locked into Oxylabs for proxy infrastructure and want single-vendor management.

Start free with Scrape.do and see the difference for yourself ➡

5. Bright Data

Click to view full-size image

×

Bright Data’s Web Scraper API delivered 98.44% success rates with 10.6-second response times in testing, the highest success rate measured across all providers.

The platform operates over 150 million IPs and offers 120+ ready-made no-code scrapers for popular websites including Amazon, LinkedIn, Walmart, and social media platforms. Pricing is $1.50 per 1,000 requests for standard domains and $2.50 for premium targets, with automatic parameter selection through Web Unlocker that handles proxy rotation, browser fingerprints, and CAPTCHA solving behind the scenes.

Pros

• Highest API success rate tested: 98.44% beats Oxylabs’ 92.52% by nearly 6%, delivering perfect 100% success on Indeed, Zillow, Capterra, and Google in testing.
• Significantly faster than Oxylabs API: 10.6s vs 17.5s average response times. When scraping thousands of pages, that speed difference substantially increases your throughput capacity.
• Much cheaper per request: $1.50 vs $6.39 per 1K makes Bright Data far more affordable for production scraping despite being the premium provider in the space.
• 120+ no-code scrapers: Pre-built data collectors for Amazon, LinkedIn, Walmart eliminate custom parsing work entirely. Non-technical users can schedule tasks through the web interface.
• Automatic parameter selection: Web Unlocker determines whether residential proxies, JavaScript rendering, or specific retry logic is needed for each request. You send the URL and receive results without parameter experimentation.

Cons

• Fixed pricing regardless of complexity: $1.50 per 1K charges the same for static HTML and JavaScript-heavy pages, penalizing simple scraping where lighter parameters would suffice.
• Slower than Scrape.do: 10.6s trails Scrape.do’s 4.7s. Still significantly faster than Oxylabs, but the speed gap is noticeable when scraping high volumes.
• Pay-per-GB proxy model creates unpredictability: Like Oxylabs, the residential proxy product charges $8/GB with bandwidth-based billing that varies based on page sizes, making budget forecasting difficult.

Oxylabs vs Bright Data

Bright Data’s Web Scraper API dominates Oxylabs across every metric: 98.44% vs 92.52% success (notably higher), 10.6s vs 17.5s response (significantly faster), and $1.50 vs $6.39 per 1K (much cheaper). The 120+ no-code scrapers and automatic Web Unlocker parameter selection provide features Oxylabs’ API lacks entirely.

On proxy infrastructure, Oxylabs holds advantages: 175M vs 150M IPs (larger pool), 0.41s vs 1.12s response (faster), and 99.82% vs 98.96% success (higher reliability). Both deliver strong proxy networks suitable for enterprise operations.

The difference: Bright Data built competitive web scraping APIs alongside its proxy business. Oxylabs built world-class proxy infrastructure and added APIs as an afterthought. If you need proxies, either works. If you need a web scraping API, Bright Data wins decisively on performance, features, and cost.

What to Pick?

• For largest proxy pool with better pricing: SOAX’s 191M IPs beats Oxylabs’ 175M at significantly lower cost ($3.60/GB vs $8/GB) with unified pricing across datacenter and residential proxies.
• For highest success rate among alternatives: Decodo delivers 99.86% success—outperforming even Oxylabs’ 99.82% at much lower cost ($3/GB vs $8/GB) with an intuitive dashboard that takes minutes to configure.
• For unlimited bandwidth on budget: IPRoyal’s flat per-IP pricing with unlimited datacenter bandwidth at $7/GB residential (slightly cheaper than Oxylabs) eliminates overage concerns for high-volume operations.
• For highest web scraping API success rate: Bright Data delivers 98.44% success at 10.6s (significantly faster than Oxylabs API) and $1.50 per 1K (much cheaper), plus 120+ no-code scrapers with automatic parameter selection.
• For fastest web scraping API: Scrape.do delivers 98.19% success at 4.7s (nearly 4x faster than Oxylabs API) and $0.80 per 1K (dramatically cheaper), making it the superior choice for speed-focused scraping operations.

Scrape.do combines near-perfect success rates (98.19%), the fastest response times tested (4.7s), and the most affordable per-request cost ($0.80), all with transparent opt-in pricing and a generous free tier to test before committing.

Start scraping today with 1000 free credits.